Cases 11 - 20 of 23
ATMOS NATION, LLC. et al v. All Rise Records, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60032
Plaintiff:
ATMOS NATION, LLC. and Atmos Technology, LLC
Defendant:
All Rise Records, Inc. and Carlos Perry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Strickland v. Perry
as 1:2015cv03400
Plaintiff:
Terri V. Strickland
Defendant:
Tyler Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Food Marketing Consultants, Inc. v. Perry's Ice Cream Company, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61368
Plaintiff:
Food Marketing Consultants, Inc.
Defendant:
Perry's Ice Cream Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0025
AF HOLDINGS LLC v. JACKSON
as 5:2012cv00429
Plaintiff:
AF HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
PERRY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Holt v. Perry et al
as 3:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Maressa M. Holt, E. H., Jr., R. C. and others
Defendant:
Tyler Perry, Wackenhut Security Corporation, Elrod and Elrod Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Perry v. Khan et al
as 3:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
Johnnie N. Perry
Defendant:
Shahid Khan , National Football League and Roger Goodell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Holt v. Wackenhunt Corp et al
as 3:2011cv01252
Plaintiff:
Maressa M Holt
Defendant:
Wackenhunt Corp, John Ivory, Tyler Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Tyson et al
as 1:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Gary Tyson, Karaoke Krave, Robert Montague and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Perry v. Rae et al
as 8:2009cv01830
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perry
Defendant:
Stephen T. Rae, Esxlab.com Inc., Lawrence Karnis and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Watt v. Butler et al
as 1:2008cv03386
Plaintiff:
Charles Watt and Charles Watt
Defendant:
Dennis Butler, Lefabian Williams, Carlos Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
