Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 552
Wareka v. Azuri Health LLC et al
as 1:2023cv22346
Plaintiff: TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS and Tamara Wareka
Defendant: AZURI HEALTH LLC d/b/a AZURI CENTER, Does 1 through 10 inclusive and Azuri Health LLC doing business as AZURI CENTER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
NOVO NORDISK A/S et al v. EFFINGER HEALTH PA
as 4:2023cv00265
Plaintiff: Novo Nordisk Inc., NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC
Defendant: Effinger Health, P.A. D/B/A Nuvida RX Weight Loss Tallahassee Clinic doing business as NUVIDA RX WEIGHT LOSS TALLAHASSEE CLINIC and EFFINGER HEALTH PA doing business as NUVIDA RX WEIGHT LOSS TALLAHASSEE CLINIC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Boyd et al v. Deadwood Tobacco Company
as 1:2023cv22213
Plaintiff: Vaughn Boyd, SWI-DE, LLC d/b/a Drew Estate and SWI-DE, LLC
Defendant: Deadwood Tobacco Company a/k/a Deadwood Tobacco Company Corporation, Deadwood Tobacco Company and Deadwood Tobacco Company Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Boyd et al v. Deadwood Tobacco Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv22215
Plaintiff: Vaughn Boyd, SWI-DE, LLC d/b/a Drew Estate and SWI-DE, LLC doing business as Drew Estate
Defendant: Deadwood Tobacco Company a/k/a Deadwood Tobacco Company Corporation, Deadwood Tobacco Company and Deadwood Tobacco Company Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
PMC Professional Management & Consulting, LLC v. Red Buddha Bar and Hookah Lounge, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv61110
Plaintiff: PMC PROFESIONAL MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, LLC and PMC Professional Management & Consulting, LLC
Defendant: RED BUDDHA BAR AND HOOKAH LOUNGE, LLC, SINCLAIR PROPERTIES, LLC d/b/a VILLA SINCLAIR BEACH SUITES AND SPA and HUGHES LONGELIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
ADIDAS AG et al v. adidasnosko.com et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv61093
Defendant: adidasnosko.com, adidascanadawebsite.com, adidasindiashoes.com and others
Plaintiff: ADIDAS AG, ADIDAS INTERNATIONAL MARKETING B.V. and ADIDAS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Broadcast Music Inc., et al v. The Shack Riverfront LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00857
Plaintiff: Broadcast Music Inc.,, EMI CONSORTIUM SONGS, INC. d/b/a EMI LONGITUDE MUSIC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Defendant: The Shack Riverfront LLC d/b/a The Shack Riverfront; Robert Kittleson and Katherine Kittleson, each individually, Roys Boys LLC, The Shack Riverfront LLC doing business as The Shack Riverfront and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
VPR Brands, LP v. Vape Loft Abercorn, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00115
Cross Defendant: VPR Brands, LP
Defendant: Vape Loft Abercorn, LLC, Vape Loft Columbus, LLC, Vape Loft Hunter, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: IMIRACLE (HK)., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
CreeLED, Inc. v. Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv60780
Plaintiff: CreeLED, Inc.
Defendant: Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A, SellerX One Ltd. d/b/a H&S Alliance UK Ltd., ecomamall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. RDS Grocery, LLC
as 3:2023cv00478
Plaintiff: Prepared Food Photos, Inc. f/k/a Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc., Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant: RDS Grocery, LLC d/b/a Premier Meats & Seafood and RDS Grocery, LLC doing business as Premier Meats & Seafood
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?