Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Imiracle (HK) Limited v. South Pacific Life, Inc., et al
as 8:2022cv02897
Plaintiff:
Imiracle (HK) Limited
Defendant:
South Pacific Life, Inc doing business as The Good Life Smoke Shop, Bugra Guzelce, Serkan Gul and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Parelli Natural Horse-Man-Ship, Inc. v. Parelli et al
as 5:2020cv00616
Defendant:
Andrew Wood, Inc. dba Legendary Marketing, Paul Flockhart aka Andrew Wood, Linda Parelli and others
Plaintiff:
Parelli Natural Horse-Man-Ship, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044
APL Microscopic, LLC v. Secular Pro-life, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Kelsey L. Hazzard and Secular Pro-life, Inc.
Plaintiff:
APL MICROSCOPIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
APL MICROSCOPIC, LLC v. Secular Pro-life, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00858
Plaintiff:
APL MICROSCOPIC, LLC
Defendant:
Secular Pro-life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Salt Life, LLC v. Shaka Life, Inc
as 1:2018cv25048
Plaintiff:
SALT LIFE, LLC
Defendant:
SHAKA LIFE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Salt Life, LLC v. Shaka Life, Inc
as 3:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
Salt Life, LLC
Defendant:
Shaka Life, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SHAKA LIFE, INC. v. SALT LIFE, LLC
as 1:2018cv23592
Plaintiff:
SHAKA LIFE, INC.
Defendant:
SALT LIFE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Vapor Life, LLC v. Vapor 4 Life, Inc.
as 0:2014cv62226
Plaintiff:
Vapor Life, LLC
Defendant:
Vapor 4 Life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
LIGHT FOR LIFE INC et al v. OUR FIRM FOUNDATION FOR KOREANS INC et al
as 3:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
LIGHT FOR LIFE INC and DAVID BYUNG KOOK KANG
Defendant:
CHANG SUP SHIM, JUSTIN KIM, OUR FIRM FOUNDATION FOR KOREANS INC and others
Counter Defendant:
GINA CHO
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Read My T, Inc. v. Swamp Life, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00740
Plaintiff:
Read My T, Inc.
Defendant:
Swamp Life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
