Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Acosta v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv21002
Plaintiff:
Roger Acosta
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00315
Plaintiff:
Roger McDonnell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Horton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boswell v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roger Boswell
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv03047
Plaintiff:
Elise Ann Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Corley v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv04349
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Corley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blum v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2020cv01538
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Roger Blum, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morris v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv03691
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woodson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01435
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Roger Woodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv00133
Not Yet Classified:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
