Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Christmas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Robin T. Christmas
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Foley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02833
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Foley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Etty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Brian T. Etty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02286
Plaintiff:
Jasper T. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bradley v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Frankie T. Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wright v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Wesley T. Wright
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Young v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Laphonse A. T. Young
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1382 Eligibility for Benefits
GAYDOS v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA T GAYDOS
Defendant:
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Hicks
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1382
Layfield v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Travis T. Layfield
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
