Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Vargas v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv22456
Plaintiff:
Giselle Monike Vargas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Vargas Camacho v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Vargas Camacho
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00353
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Damaris R. Vargas
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00854
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jaxrielly Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Camacho Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv03029
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Camacho Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Vargas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv04201
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv00726
Plaintiff:
Felix Noel Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vargas v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Lori K. Vargas
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morales Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Morales Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vargas v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
Steven Troy Vargas
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
