Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Churba v. Esquenazi
as 0:2019cv60793
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Denise Esquenazi
Plaintiff:
Aaron Churba
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Churba v. Denise Esquenazi
as 0:2019cv60794
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Denise Esquenazi
Plaintiff:
Aaron Churba
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Johnson v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 9:2019cv80384
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Department of US Treasury
Plaintiff:
Peter C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Makozy v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018cv14404
Defendant:
Wanda Quiles, Charles Zimmerer, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Makozy
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Foxx v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 8:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
George J. Foxx
Defendant:
United States of America, David Kautter, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Makozy v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018cv14050
Plaintiff:
Gregory Makozy
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Wanda Quiles and G. Fantanucci
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Lopez v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2017cv24672
Petitioner:
Jorge Lopez
Respondent:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Meyers v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2017cv24669
Petitioner:
Stuart I Meyers
Respondent:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Meyers v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2017cv24670
Petitioner:
Stuart I Meyers
Respondent:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Lopez v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2017cv24674
Petitioner:
Jorge Lopez
Respondent:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
