Cases 101 - 110 of 194
Clements v. DSM Supply LLC
as 8:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
Kathy Clements
Defendant:
DSM Supply LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Proffitt v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2012cv01337
Plaintiff:
Luiza Proffitt
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and Kathy Baranowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Berry et al
as 6:2012mc00123
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Leroy Berry, Kathy Krell, Jim Kaczkowski and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Reorganized Human Dynamics Corporation v. Human Dynamics Captive Management et al
as 1:2012mi00178
Plaintiff:
Reorganized Human Dynamics Corporation
Defendant:
Human Dynamics Captive Management, G. Douglas Anderton, Kathy Anderton and others
Collier v. BP America Production Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00593
Plaintiff:
Reed Collier , Glenn Nelson , Michael Beech and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company, Inc. , Edmund Thompson , Joseph Lobo and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Holmes Motors, Inc. v. McBride et al
as 1:2011mc00025
Appellant:
Holmes Motors, Inc.
Appellee:
Kathy E. McBride and John R. McBride
U.S. Steel Mining Company, LLC v. Director, OWCP, et al
as 11-14468
Petitioner:
U.S. STEEL MINING COMPANY, LLC
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OWCP and KATHY STARKS, Widow of Eligah Starks (Deceased)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
