Cases 101 - 107 of 107
William Lowry v. Walgreen Company, Inc.
as 10-14759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SEAN MICHAEL LOWRY
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREEN COMPANY, INC.
:
SERVICE
Kramer v. Walgreen Co.
as 8:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
Ken Kramer
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., CVS Caremark Corporation, Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Movant:
United States of America , State of California, State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Walgreen Co. et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv03019
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co., Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re:
Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones et al v. Walgreens Co.
as 0:2007mc61032
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, III, Robert Lee Jones, III, Robert Lee Jones, III and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Jones et al v. Walgreens Co.
as 1:2007mc61032
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, III, Robert Lee Jones, Jr. and Broadspire Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
