Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Amy Anderson v. Warden, et al
as 21-10593
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant: AMY BISHOP ANDERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00072
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phillips et al v. Keystone Moving Group LLC et al
as 9:2021cv80041
Plaintiff: Jason Brian Phillips and Hope Phillips
Defendant: Margaret Drayton, Benard Bishop, Neville Desilva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Regions Bank v. Ruby Tuesday Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant: J Russell Mothershed, Paul Zimmerman, James Holland and others
Plaintiff: Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
William Bishop v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-13667
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIAM ARTHUR BISHOP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61960
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fred Brooks v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and, et al
as 20-12837
Defendant / Appellee: SHEPARD, Assistant Regional Director, GDCP, J. GOODY, Correctional Counselor, GDCP, WILLIAM POWELL, Deputy Warden, GDCP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRED DALTON BROOKS
USA v. Nicholas Bishop
as 20-12792
Defendant / Appellant: NICHOLAS BISHOP
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ashley Bishop v. USA
as 20-12702
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant: ASHLEY ANDERS BISHOP
Fred Brooks v. Warden, et al
as 20-12352
Defendant / Appellee: SHEPARD, Assistant Regional Director, GDCP, J. GOODY, Correctional Counselor, GDCP, WILLIAM POWELL, Deputy Warden, GDCP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRED DALTON BROOKS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?