Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Boe et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner: Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hollie Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 21-14305
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA and others
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff: Mishanta Reyes
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pulte Homes Tennessee Limited Partnership v. PBG of South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 9:2021mc81527
Plaintiff: Pulte Homes Tennessee Limited Partnership
Defendant: PBG of South Carolina, Inc., Palm beach Grading, Inc., Eugene Eichelberger and others
Garnishee: City National Bank of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Professional Recovery Management Inc
as 5:2021cv00614
Defendant: Professional Recovery Management Inc a Tennessee corporation doing business as Fox Collection Center
Plaintiff: Christina Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-13695
Plaintiff / Appellant: BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant: DON DAVIS, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Nebraka Department of Banking and Finance et al
as 1:2020mc24014
Defendant: TMTE, Inc., Lucas Thomas Erb, Luke Asher and others
Plaintiff: Iowa Insurance Commissioner, Nebraka Department of Banking and Finance, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE, Inc. et al
as 2:2020mc03928
Defendant: TMTE, Inc., Metals.com, Lucas Thomas Erb and others
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, State of Texas and others
Receiver: Kelly M. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
The New Georgia Project, et al v. Brad Raffensperger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-13360
Defendant / Appellant: AHN LE, in their official capacities as Members of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as the Georgia Secretary of State and the Chair of the Georgia State Election Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: BEVERLY PYNE, CANDACE WOODALL, REAGAN JENNINGS and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?