Cases 21 - 30 of 33
United States of America v. Evans
as 1:2011mi00120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory D. Evans
Movant:
AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv23679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watters v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Watters and Richard L. Watters
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., ILD Corp. and Contact Message Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hausler et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2009cv22611
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Hausler, Jeannette Hausler, The Estate of Robert Otis Fuller and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Fidel Castro Ruz, Raul Castro Ruz and others
Garnishee:
AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Hausler et al v. Republic Of Cuba et al
as 1:2009cv20871
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Hausler, Jeannette Hausler, Estate of Robert Otis Fuller and others
Defendant:
Republic Of Cuba, Fidel Castro Ruz, Raul Castro Ruz and others
Garnishee:
AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AT&T Corp. v. Fulton County Government
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Fulton County Government
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act
AT&T Corp. v. Skymad Technologies Corporation
as 8:2007cv01847
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Skymad Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
