Cases 21 - 30 of 381
Doe v. Fenix Internet, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23793
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Fenix Internet, LLC, Michelson Romelus and Bendjy Charles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Doe v. Fenix Internet, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv62176
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Fenix Internet, LLC, Michelson Romelus and Bendjy Charles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Doe v. Patterson et al
as 5:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robye Patterson and Limestone County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Cunningham v. Jordan et al
as 1:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Yakim Jordan, MJ Ministries Spreading the Gospel, Inc., MJ Ministries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Mohon v. Agentra LLC et al
as 2:2022mc14111
Plaintiff:
Barbara Mohon
Defendant:
Agentra LLC, TracyAnn Nicole Hamilton and Jane Does 1-10
Jane Doe v. Jomy SterlingIn re: Jane Doe v. Jomy Sterling
as 22-10400
Petitioner:
In re: JANE DOE, a.k.a. Beeism
Respondent:
JOMY STERLING
Doe v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe et al v. Austin, III et al
as 8:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, Antony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gernard D. ChestnutIn re: Gernard D. Chestnut
as 21-14488
Petitioner:
In re: GERNARD CHESTNUT
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN, J. NEEL, Lieutenant, HUGHES, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
