Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Fenelus v. Citrus Family Care Network of Miami Dade and Monroe County
as 1:2019cv25064
Plaintiff:
Djino Fenelus
Defendant:
Citrus Family Care Network of Miami Dade and Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Southern Company, et al v. Monroe County Employees', et al
as 19-90015
Respondent:
MONROE COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 149 PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
EDWARD DAY, G. EDISON HOLLAND, THOMAS O. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00976
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alfred Kennedy v. Key West Police Department, et al
as 19-11326
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and KEY WEST POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED KENNEDY
The County Commission of Monroe County, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv10049
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
The County Commission of Monroe County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James Scott v. Officer Bradwells, et al
as 19-10963
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAMSEY, Monroe County Sheriff, individually and official capacity and OFFICER BRADWELLS, in individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SCOTT
Tobias Bybee v. Monroe County Detention Fac.
as 19-10045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBIAS LEE BYBEE
Defendant / Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
