Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Henderson v. Scott et al
as 1:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
Prince Lester J. Henderson
Defendant:
David K. Scott, Marc E. Ripps, Kristen L. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dario Morrow v. USA
as 12-13668
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARIO MORROW
ProEquities, Inc. v. Mekelburg et al
as 1:2011cv01851
Plaintiff:
ProEquities, Inc.
Defendant:
Larry Mekelburg , Sandy Mekelburg , Robert Sill and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morrow v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
as 7:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Wanda Morrow, Wanda Morrow and Wanda Morrow
Defendant:
Franklin Collection Service, Inc. and Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morrow v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
as 7:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Wanda Morrow, Wanda Morrow and Wanda Morrow
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Abraham et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02844
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Abraham, Keith Abraham, Yolanda Aguirre and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morrow v. Countrywide Home Loans
as 7:2007cv02313
Plaintiff:
Mary E Morrow
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans and Countrywide Home Loans
Miscellaneou:
Bankruptcy Clerk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
