Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Albers et al v. Commonwealth Capital Corp. et al
as 6:2016cv01713
Plaintiff:
Christine Albers , Richard Barrow , Marylou Barrow and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth Capital Corp., Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund, Inc., Commonwealth Capital Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Norris
as 1:2016cv02834
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Lamont Norris
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
In re: Norris Mothersill
as 16-13717
Petitioner:
In re: NORRIS MOTHERSILL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Christopher Nolan
as 16-12431
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER NORRIS NOLAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tim Norris, et al v. League of Women Voters of Flo, et al
as 15-14670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIM NORRIS and RANDY MAGGARD
Interested Party - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA, DIERDRE MACNAB, JUDITH BYRNE RILEY and others
:
SERVICE
Campbell Harrison & Dagley L.L.P. et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2015mi00087
Plaintiff:
Campbell Harrison & Dagley L.L.P. and Calloway, Norris, Burdette and Weber, PLLC
Defendant:
Albert G. Hill, III and Erin Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
NORRIS et al v. DETZNER
as 3:2015cv00343
Defendant:
KEN DETZNER
Plaintiff:
TIM NORRIS and RANDY MAGGARD
Intervenor_defendant:
The League of Women Voters of Florida , Deirdre Macnab , Judith Byrne Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Garfield Royes
as 15-13420
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GARFIELD NORRIS ROYES, a.k.a. Garfield Royce, a.k.a. Dwayne N. Royce
USA v. Tavaries Norris
as 15-12798
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TAVARIES NORRIS, a.k.a. Tapia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
