Cases 31 - 40 of 1,717
Montford v. Pryor, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv20371
Plaintiff:
John Montford
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Jr., Lanier Anderson, III, Gerald Tjoflat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Griffin v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc et al
as 1:2023cv05560
Petitioner:
Nikita J. Griffin
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Application to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mi00001
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
USA v. Adam Smith
as 24-10044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM H. SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
