Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2017cv00400
Plaintiff: Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Robert M. Speer, Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Gulf Restoration Network, Inc., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 16-15545
Petitioner: GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, INC., FLINT RIVERKEEPER and SIERRA CLUB
Intervenor: TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO., FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION, LLC and others
Respondent: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae: FLORIDA RELIABILITY COORDINATING COUNCIL, INC.
: SERVICE, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, SPECTRA ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Waterkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 0:2016cv61975
Plaintiff: Miami Waterkeeper , Center for Biological Diversity , Florida Wildlife Federation and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers , Jo-Ellen Darcy , Todd T. Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0181
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-13486
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Amicus Curiae: EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., BRAIN BARRS and DAVID JAMES
Defendant / Appellee: U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN J. CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and THOMAS J. TICKNER, in his Official Capacity as Commander, Savannah District of the US Army Corps of Engineers
Green Sea Turtle et al v. City of Fort Lauderdale et al
as 0:2015cv62313
Plaintiff: Green Sea Turtle , Loggerhead Sea Turtle and Leatherback Sea Turtle
Defendant: City of Fort Lauderdale, Broward County Board of County Commissioners, Galt Mile Community Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
Black Warrior Riverkeeper Inc. et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01893
Plaintiff: Black Warrior Riverkeeper Inc. and Defenders of Wildlife
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, In, et al v. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-14745
Plaintiff - Appellant: BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor - Appellee: ALABAMA COAL ASSOCIATION, MS & R EQUIPMENT CO., INC., REED MINERALS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and JON CHYTKA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District
State of Georgia, et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al
as 15-13252
Petitioner: STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent: ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS), in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2015cv02488
Plaintiff: Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. , Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Association, Inc.
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency , United States Army Corps of Engineers , Gina McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection, et al
as 15-13102
Petitioner: SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC., GEORGIA AGRIBUSINESS COUNCIL, INC. and GREATER ATLANTA HOMEBUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?