Cases 41 - 50 of 487
In re: Arthur Clark
as 23-10919
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR LAWTON CLARK
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Jerome Clarke v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 23-10485
Petitioner:
JEROME CLARKE
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In re: Shannon Clark
as 23-10161
Petitioner:
In re: SHANNON LEVON CLARK
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goodman et al v. Columbus Regional Healthcare System, Inc.
as 1:2022mi00058
Plaintiff:
Barbara Goodman, Lisa Countryman, Sharon Clarke and others
Defendant:
Columbus Regional Healthcare System, Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
USA v. Charles Clark, et al
as 22-13105
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES CLARK, a.k.a. Bunky Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
