Cases 41 - 50 of 795
Smith v. Bell et al
as 1:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Willie G. Smith
Defendant:
Lucy Jackson Bell, Kisha Corey-Spann and Jacqulyn Mims
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Kenneth Jackson, Jr.
as 23-11516
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH R. JACKSON, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. UNCUT LLC et al
as 1:2023cv20618
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
UNCUT LLC doing business as UNCUT MIAMI and Karon C. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
USA v. Derick Irisha Brown
as 23-10870
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DERICK IRISHA BROWN, a.k.a. Quentesa Jackson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dolgencorp, LLC v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al
as 23-90003
Petitioner:
DOLGENCORP, LLC
Respondent:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and VINCENT JACKSON
Bay County, Florida et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Bay County, Florida, Calhoun County, Florida, City of Niceville, Florida and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc. and MCKINSEY AND COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
