Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 112
Lane v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00082
Plaintiff: Steve Lane
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , United States Department of Agriculture and Sonny Perdue
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ANAZA et al v. AUDI AG et al
as 3:2017cv00252
Plaintiff: OZOMA ERICA ANAZA , ROGER ASHTON , MARCELLO BALDERRAMA and others
Defendant: AUDI AG and AUDI OF AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Walden v. Walden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00531
Plaintiff: Walden, Eagle Mountain Properties, L.C., Eagle Mountain Properties of Utah, L.L.C. and others
Defendant: Jason A. Walden, Tiffany Walden, TI Mortgage Company and others
Petitioner: Central Storage LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: Ira Lane
as 17-10900
Petitioner: In re: IRA L. LANE
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bobo's Drugs, Inc. v. Lane Labs-USA, Inc.
as 2:2017cv14046
Plaintiff: Bobo's Drugs, Inc.
Defendant: Lane Labs-USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Earthlink Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00433
Plaintiff: Sam Carter
Defendant: Earthlink Holdings Corp. , Joseph F. Eazor , Susan D. Bowick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Valley Produce Corporation v. C. Lane Company, LLC
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff: Valley Produce Corporation
Defendant: C. Lane Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
In re: Jeremiah Lane
as 17-10090
Petitioner: In re: JEREMIAH LANE
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Jeremiah Lane
as 16-17812
Petitioner: In re: JEREMIAH LANE
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lane v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01993
Plaintiff: John Lane
Defendant: Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?