Cases 41 - 50 of 116
THOMPSON v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS LLC
as 4:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
RONDA LANE THOMPSON
Defendant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Jeremiah Lane
as 17-14876
Petitioner:
In re: JEREMIAH LANE
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Owen Hinkson
as 17-14142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OWEN HINKSON, a.k.a.: Michael G. Baxter, Micheal G. Baxter, Owen Baxter, Paul Baxter, Paul Christopher Baxter, Charles Downs, Owen Hickson, Johns Hinkson, Owen G. Hinkson, Owens Hinkson, Michael Lane, Michael Mc Lane, Michael McLane, Michael Payne, Owen H
USA v. Colitha Bush
as 17-13081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COLITHA PATRICE BUSH, a.k.a. Diane Lane, a.k.a. Diane Rice
Lane v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 6:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Steve Lane
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , United States Department of Agriculture and Sonny Perdue
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ANAZA et al v. AUDI AG et al
as 3:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
OZOMA ERICA ANAZA , ROGER ASHTON , MARCELLO BALDERRAMA and others
Defendant:
AUDI AG and AUDI OF AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Walden v. Walden et al
as 6:2017cv00531
Plaintiff:
Walden, Eagle Mountain Properties, L.C., Eagle Mountain Properties of Utah, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Jason A. Walden, Tiffany Walden, TI Mortgage Company and others
Petitioner:
Central Storage LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: Ira Lane
as 17-10900
Petitioner:
In re: IRA L. LANE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bobo's Drugs, Inc. v. Lane Labs-USA, Inc.
as 2:2017cv14046
Plaintiff:
Bobo's Drugs, Inc.
Defendant:
Lane Labs-USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Earthlink Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00433
Plaintiff:
Sam Carter
Defendant:
Earthlink Holdings Corp. , Joseph F. Eazor , Susan D. Bowick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
