Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Perlman v. American Express Centurion Bank et al
as 0:2019cv61386
Defendant:
American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., American Express Company, American Express Bank, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Perlman, Esq. and Jonathan E. Perlman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Perlman v. American Express Centurion Bank et al
as 0:2019cv61385
Defendant:
American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., American Express Company, American Express Bank, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Perlman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Phillips v. The American Express Company
as 9:2019cv80217
Plaintiff:
Elroy A. Phillips
Defendant:
The American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
OWEN v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
as 3:2018cv01503
Plaintiff:
BILLY OWEN
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dall v. American Express Company
as 2:2018cv00454
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dall
Defendant:
American Express Company
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Abbate v. Nationwide Credit, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv22466
Plaintiff:
Julia Abbate
Defendant:
Nationwide Credit, Inc. and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Umana v. American Express Company et al
as 0:2018cv61256
Plaintiff:
Roxana Umana
Defendant:
American Express Company and Nationwide Credit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Stanislav Pavlenko
as 17-15047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STANISLAV PAVLENKO
:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC., CITIGROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
