Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Jackson et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Karun N. Jackson and Ursula D. Jackson
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Services , The Bank of New York Mellon , MERS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461
Rivas v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 9:2015cv81725
Appellant:
Armando Adames Rivas
Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Bayview Loan Servicing LLC , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Rivas v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 9:2015cv81723
Appellant:
Armando Adames Rivas
Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Britton et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv02030
Plaintiff:
Gerald C. Britton and Dorothy L. Britton
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Regulus v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 2:2015cv00953
Plaintiff:
Angela J Regulus
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA, The , The Bank of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GILLIAM v. TRANS UNION LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
LEE GILLIAM
Defendant:
TRANS UNION LLC , BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC , BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Zambrana v. The Bank Of New York Mellon
as 1:2015cv21794
Plaintiff:
Benito Zambrana
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and Bank Of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015mi00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
