Cases 51 - 60 of 137,771
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wang & Gao Family Trust et al v. TA Partners LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Wang & Gao Family Trust, Lingyun Gu, Jingbo Xiao and others
Defendant:
TA Partners LLC, TA Partners Apartment Fund II LLC, Chienshen (Johnny) Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Yudit Savorit Ferrera Trust Estate v. United States of America and all of its Subdivision, Subsidiaries, Territories, Enclaves and Minor Islands
as 1:2024mi00045
Plaintiff:
Yudit Savorit Ferrera Trust Estate
Defendant:
United States of America and all of its Subdivision, Subsidiaries, Territories, Enclaves and Minor Islands
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marous v. Now Optics Holdings, LLC
as 1:2024cv22122
Plaintiff:
Richard Marous
Defendant:
Now Optics Holdings, LLC doing business as Stanton Optical
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Weingrad v. DH & RK Investments LLC
as 9:2024cv80701
Plaintiff:
Leon Weingrad
Defendant:
DH & RK Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
