Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Maxwell
as 1:2012mi00154
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Lawrence T. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
USA v. Vencot Maxwell
as 12-10932
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VENCOT MAREAN MAXWELL, a.k.a. Timmy Tyron Joseph
Silverthorne v. Yeaman et al
as 1:2012cv20325
Plaintiff:
Andrea K Silverthorne
Defendant:
Allan Yeaman , Blue Sky Miami, Inc. , Business Law Group, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.E. Dunn Construction Co. v. Griffin et al
as 1:2011cv03891
Plaintiff:
J.E. Dunn Construction Co.
Defendant:
Robert J. Griffin and Henry G. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
USA v. Maxwell Franklyn
as 10-15261
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXWELL GEORGE FRANKLYN, a.k.a. Cashmore Forrester, a.k.a. Terry Lee Taylor
Francis et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01624
Plaintiff:
J Timothy Francis , Frances N Francis and James L North
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co Inc, MK Holding Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Duncan et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01563
Plaintiff:
Walter C Duncan , Dice K Lineberry , Francis H Kohn and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co, Inc, MK Holding, Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Maxwell et al v. Maesbury Homes, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00685
Plaintiff:
Stuart Maxwell and Janet Maxwell
Defendant:
Maesbury Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Schilleci et al v. Morgan Keegan & Company Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01485
Plaintiff:
Donald J Schilleci, Donald J Schilleci, Mary Anna Schilleci and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Company Inc, Morgan Keegan & Company Inc, Morgan Keegan & Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
