Cases 51 - 60 of 322
Chester Coleman v. Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc., et al
as 21-13784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHESTER COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MORRIS-SHEA BRIDGE COMPANY, INC. and RICHARD SHEA
Freddie Seltzer v. Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc., et al
as 21-13764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDDIE SELTZER, CHESTER COLEMAN and LARRY COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MORRIS-SHEA BRIDGE COMPANY, INC. and RICHARD SHEA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Steve Morris
as 21-13766
Petitioner:
In re: STEVE A. MORRIS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Nview Health, Inc. v. Sheehan
as 8:2021cv02441
Plaintiff:
Nview Health, Inc.
Defendant:
David V. Sheehan
Petitioner:
Morris Manning & Martin, LLP and Lawrence H Kunin
Gates et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Gates, Teresa Gates, Angela Irvin and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Nview Health, Inc. v. Sheehan
as 1:2021cv04324
Plaintiff:
Nview Health, Inc.
Defendant:
David V. Sheehan, M.D.
Petitioner:
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP and Lawrence H. Kunin, Esq.
Nview Health, Inc. v. Sheehan
as 1:2021mi00082
Plaintiff:
Nview Health, Inc.
Defendant:
David V. Sheehan, M.D.
Petitioner:
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP and Lawrence H. Kunin, Esq.
Bock Holdings, LLC et al v. Republic of Honduras et al
as 9:2021cv81781
Plaintiff:
Bock Holdings, LLC, Cindy Miller, Gary Miller and others
Defendant:
Republic of Honduras and National Agrarian Institute of Honduras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyle v. U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Aviation and Missile Center et al
as 5:2021cv01247
Plaintiff:
Morris Lyle
Defendant:
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Aviation and Missile Center, Jeffrey L. Langhout, Louis Scaroni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
