Cases 51 - 60 of 456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brandie Robinson v. City of Huntsville, et al
as 21-13979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDIE ROBINSON, as personal representative of the estate of Crystal Ragland
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, BRETT COLLUM, in his individual and official capacity, JONATHAN HENDERSON, in his individual and official capacity and others
State of Florida, et al v. O.S.H.A., U.S. D.O.L.
as 21-13866
Petitioner:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Robinson v. Kirkland
as 0:2021cv62268
Plaintiff:
Andramedia Cheryl Robinson and Andramedia Cheryl Robinson-Washington
Defendant:
Dwane Eugene Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lester Robinson v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-13822
Petitioner:
LESTER HENRY ROBINSON
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Willie Robinson v. Alexander City, Alabama, et al
as 21-13787
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIE ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER CITY, ALABAMA, a city in the State of Alabama, JIM NABORS, Mayor, an individual, BOBBY L. TAPLEY, Councilman, an individual and others
Gates et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Gates, Teresa Gates, Angela Irvin and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
