Cases 61 - 70 of 2,600
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bozorgmehr PouyehIn re: Bozorgmehr Pouyeh
as 23-12532
Petitioner:
In re: BOZORGMEHR POUYEH
Respondent:
PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM, a.k.a. Trust, CARLOS A. MIGOYA, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, STEVEN J. GEDDE, Program Director of Opthamology Residency Program and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
STILWELL v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21920
Defendant:
CHARLES LESLIE STILWELL, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SUN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 1:2023cv21855
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1, JOHN DOES 1 - 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS INC, et al
as 3:2023cv16856
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PLOOM INC, ALTRIA GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
