Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Thomas-McDonald v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Bonnita Thomas-McDonald
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki , Simone Brown , Thomas Hartney and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 1780 Recovery of VA Overpayment
Blackshear v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2012mc01822
Plaintiff:
Earnest Blackshear
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
CONART PRECAST LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
CONART PRECAST LLC
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Bohannon v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2011mi00082
Plaintiff:
Donnie L. Bohannon
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Conart Precast LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2011cv02593
Plaintiff:
Conart Precast LLC
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Hattie Dickerson v. Sec, Dept of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 11-13474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HATTIE A. DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and CARL VINSON VA MEDICAL CENTER
Cameron v Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary
as 2:2009cv01296
Plaintiff:
Gloria Wills Cameron
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary
APlus Mobility, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
APlus Mobility, Inc. and APlus Mobility, Inc.
Defendant:
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. Nicholson et al
as 2:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
Barry Jackson, Barry Jackson and Barry Jackson
Defendant:
R James Nicholson and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Hall v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 8:2008cv00270
Plaintiff:
Robert Hall
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and James Thomas Marron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
