Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00915
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Builder Services Group, Inc. v. Riley et al
as 1:2023cv04530
Plaintiff: Builder Services Group, Inc.
Defendant: Steven Franklin Riley, Tracie Riley, Steven Christian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02850
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SCHREIBER et al v. KEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00155
Plaintiff: James Schreiber, Jr., Brenda Schreiber and JAMES SCHREIBER, JR
Defendant: Jamie Payton Key and JAMIE P KEY
3Rd Party Defendant: W A ENGINEERING LLC, CONNER GRADING LANDSCAPING INC and HOLDER CONSTRUCTION DEMOLITION LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Willie ConnerIn re: Willie Conner
as 21-12911
Petitioner: In re: WILLIE LEE CONNER
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Conner v. Capio Partners LLC
as 6:2021cv00427
Defendant: Capio Partners LLC
Plaintiff: Joshua Conner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gregory Roberts v. Harvey Wasserman, et al
as 20-14642
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY R. ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee: CONNER MAGILL and HARVEY WASSERMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00168
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Charles Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardons, et al
as 19-13547
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD CONNERS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
In re: Charles Conners
as 19-10343
Undetermined: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES EDWARD CONNERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?