Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dimitar Petlechkov v. FEDEX Corporation, et al
as 23-12259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC and others
Garrett v. O'Neal, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Carla Garrett
Defendant:
Dyck O,Neal, Inc. and Dyck O'Neal, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Andrew C. Eckhoff
Petlechkov v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04555
Plaintiff:
Dimitar Petlechkov
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Froehlich et al v. Stout Kaiser, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv05274
Defendant:
Stout Kaiser, LLC, Andrew C. Matteson and Stout Kaiser Matteson Peake & Hendrick, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ryan Froehlich and FS Comm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09
Denorris Andrews, et al v. Secretary, Department of VA, et al
as 20-10849
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, KAREN C. GAINEY, individually and GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, on Behalf of the Georgia General Assembly
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENORRIS ANDREWS and JAMES ANDREWS, c/o Clarence Andrews, Ward
Geller et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as 9:2017cv81056
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Geller and Jody L. Geller
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Andrew Davi
as 13-12775
Petitioner:
In re: ANDREW C. DAVIS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mukamal v. Bakes et al
as 1:2007cv20793
Plaintiff:
Barry E. Mukamal and Barry E. Mukamal
Defendant:
Phil Bakes, Andrew C. McKey, Craig Toll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
