Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Turner et al v. Enhance Health LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60591
Plaintiff:
Conswallo Turner, Tiesha Forman, Angelina Wells and others
Defendant:
Enhance Health LLC, TrueCoverage, LLC, Speridian Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: McIntosh County, Georgia v. Sarah Drayton, et al
as 22-11298
Petitioner:
In re: MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA
Respondent:
SARAH FRANCES DRAYTON, CAROLYN BANKS, MELVIN BANKS, SR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Angelina Marcos-Pablo, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11045
Petitioner:
JOVANI JULIAN-MARCOS, ANGELINA MARCOS-PABLO and DOMINGA JULIAN-MARCOS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thomas Heinen, et al v. Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD.
as 19-13750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ, JACOB KUNZ, PENNY BUCKNER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
Andrew Bennett, et al v. Jefferson County, Alabama
as 19-13577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLYN R. CULPEPPER, SHARON OWENS, SHARON RICE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
Eulalia Andres-Diego, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-12190
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MAGDALENA ROSALINDA DE DIEGO-ANDRES, EULALIA ANDRES-DIEGO and ANGELINA DE DIEGO-ANDRES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Hernandez Subero v. Mercantil Commerce Bank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv22770
Plaintiff:
Ana Angelina Hernandez Subero
Defendant:
Mercantil Commerce Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Angelina Pedro-Pablo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 17-11013
Petitioner:
ANGELINA PEDRO-PABLO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera Herrera v. Taveras Castillo
as 6:2016cv01260
Petitioner:
Francis Angelina Herrera Herrera
Respondent:
Llonfi Leonel Taveras Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
