Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jeffrey Vickers v. Craig Dong, et al
as 21-11858
Defendant / Appellee:
PUBLIX, SHELL GAS STATION, CRAIG E. DONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
Jeffrey Vickers v. Craig Dong, et al
as 21-11854
Defendant / Appellee:
L.E. SIMMONS, JAMES EUGENE BERRONG, BARRETT ANDREW HOLT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
Jeffrey Vickers v. David Raissi, et al
as 21-11856
Defendant / Appellee:
GA BOARD OF PRIVATE DETECTIVES, DAVID RAISSI, CRAIG E. DONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
EP&S, LLC et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
Dong Hyun Son and EP&S, LLC a Georgia Limited Liability Co. doing business as Pit Stop Convenience Store
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023
Jeffrey Vickers v. Craig Dong, et al
as 21-10988
Defendant / Appellee:
PUBLIX, SHELL GAS STATION, WEST COBB DINER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
Dong Gun Shin, et al v. Infinity Insurance Company
as 20-11290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YU KYUNG SHIN, DONG GUN SHIN and MI RYUNG SHIN
Defendant / Appellee:
INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Edward Moore v. John Dong
as 20-10092
Interested Party:
JOHN DONG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD M. MOORE
Edward M. Moore v. M/V Sunny USA, et al
as 19-10901
Defendant / Appellee:
M/V SUNNY USA, a 73 foot motor yacht USCG No. 1042503, HIN No: ISNMUL06B994 her engines, tackle, boats, gears, appurtenances etc., in rem a.k.a. Empire Discovery
Undetermined:
JOHN DONG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD M. MOORE
Dong Xubao v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-13930
Petitioner:
DONG XUBAO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zhou et al v. FCNH, Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Dong Feng Zhou and Shiying Peng
Defendant:
FCNH, Inc , Steiner Education Group, Inc , Steiner U.S. Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
