Cases 1 - 10 of 364
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Osborne v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Tashon Osborne
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rucker v. Hunter Wakefield Inc
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rucker
Defendant:
Hunter Wakefield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Cobb v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cobb
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Diamond Moore
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Madison v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
George R. Madison
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
