Cases 1 - 10 of 30,947
Elyashiv v. Collins Cash Inc.
as 0:2024cv61039
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elyashiv
Defendant:
Collins Cash Inc. doing business as Smart Business Funding
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Elyashiv v. Collins Cash Inc.
as 0:2024cv61038
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elyashiv
Defendant:
Collins Cash Inc. doing business as Smart Business Funding
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Greenberg
as 0:2024cv61035
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Diamonds Direct USA, Inc. v. I-Luxury Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02613
Plaintiff:
Diamonds Direct USA, Inc.
Defendant:
I-Luxury Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Solomon Brothers Jewelers and Lynn Tu
Kirziejonek v. Elma Transport Inc.
as 8:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Richard Kirziejonek
Defendant:
Elma Transport Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gugel et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 7:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M Gugel and Karen M Gugel
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc, Thor Industries Inc, Tiffin Motor Homes Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
