Cases 1 - 10 of 22
D. Deaton, et al v. Agnes Chappell, et al
as 23-13622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D. DEATON, T. PEAKE, J.K.D. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AGNES CHAPPELL, PATRICIA STEPHENS, ALISHA RUFFIN MAY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BAY AREA CHRISTIAN COUNSELING, LLC and KIRK.DRENNAN P.C.
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Maynard Sanders
as 22-11640
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAYNARD SANDERS
Baldwin Brown v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-14486
Petitioner:
BALDWIN MAYNARD BROWN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maynard SandersIn re: Maynard Sanders
as 21-14323
Petitioner:
In re: MAYNARD SANDERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Baldwin Brown v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-10472
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
BALDWIN MAYNARD BROWN
Michael Key, et al v. Morehouse College, et al
as 21-10043
Defendant / Appellant:
QUISHA BUGGS, individually, and as Resident Advisor for Morehouse College, MICHAEL HODGES, SHAWN MOORE, individually, and as Associate Coordinator of Resident Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and MICHAEL KEY
Maynard Godwin v. USA
as 19-14273
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAYNARD K. GODWIN and MAYNARD KENNETH GODWIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Isaac Brown v. D. Beasley, et al
as 19-11018
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. MAYNARD, #7980, D. L. BEASLEY, #6366, R. M. SESSION, #7486 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC BROWN
Isaac Brown v. R. Sessions, et al
as 19-11019
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. MAYNARD, #7980, R. M. SESSIONS, #7486, D. L. BEASLEY, #6366 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
