Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Christopher Schroeder v. Department of Corrections
as 21-10213
Respondent / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER SCHROEDER
Donald Jacobson, et al v. Rusty Norvell Concrete Pumping, et al
as 20-13680
Defendant / Appellee: ADAM GRUDER WASCH, RUSTY NORVELL CONCRETE PUMPING SERVICE, INC., NORMAN L. SCHROEDER, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONALD N. JACOBSON, RENE CANTIN and RENE MARIO CANTIN
Schroeder v. Cigar Cave Lounge, Inc.
as 8:2019cv03130
Plaintiff: Mistylea Schroeder
Defendant: Cigar Cave Lounge, Inc. and Cigar Cave Lounge Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00323
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schroeder v. Trespalacious
as 4:2012cv00123
Plaintiff: William R. Schroeder
Defendant: Jose A. Trespalacious
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Independence Institute et al v. Gessler
as 1:2011mi00126
Plaintiff: The Independence Institute, Jon Caldara, Jessica Corry and others
Defendant: Scott Gessler
Schroeder v. Financial Credit Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00063
Plaintiff: Stephen Schroeder
Defendant: Financial Credit Service, Inc. and Bruce Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schroeder v. Redline Recovery Services, LLC.
as 9:2011cv80171
Plaintiff: Pauline B. Schroeder
Defendant: Redline Recovery Services, LLC.
Mediator: Samuel L. Heller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schroeder v. Integrity Financial Partners, Inc.
as 9:2010cv81571
Plaintiff: Pauline B. Schroeder
Defendant: Integrity Financial Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schroeder et al v. Northstar Location Services, LLC
as 9:2010cv81205
Plaintiff: Cheryl P. Schroeder and Pauline B. Schroeder
Defendant: Northstar Location Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?