Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lyons et al v. Atlanta Escrow & Exchange Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Lyons and Katherine M. Lyons
Defendant:
Atlanta Escrow & Exchange Service, Inc., Allied Business Solutions, Inc., Leonardo Salinas Beltrones and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Betty Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy, et al
as 19-13812
Defendant / Appellant:
SARAH BEAUGEZ and HELPING HANDS THERAPY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BETTY R. SHIPLEY
Drummond Company, Inc. v. Terence P. Collingsworth, et al.
as 2:2016mc00944
Movant:
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and Jack Scarola/Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA
Plaintiff:
Drummond Company Inc
Defendant:
Terence P. Collingsworth and Conrad & Scherer, LLP
Intervenor:
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC
Cause Of Action: motquash
Drummond Company, Inc. v. Terrance Collingsworth, et al
as 14-15722
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRANCE P. COLLINGSWORTH and CONRAD & SCHERER, LLP
Interested Party - Appellant:
JACK SCAROLA and SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A.,
Drummond Company, Inc. v. Jack Scarola
as 14-15724
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC.
Interested Party - Appellant:
JACK SCAROLA and SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A.,
Drummond Company, Inc. v. Terence P. Collingsworth, et al.
as 9:2014mc81189
Movant:
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and Jack Scarola/Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA
Plaintiff:
Drummond Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Terence P. Collingsworth
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
