Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
City of Pompano Beach, et al v. Richard Anthony, et al
as 13-12224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF POMPANO BEACH GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SHEET METAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND, LABOURERS' PENSION FUND OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN CANADA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD E. ANTHONY, FREDERICK L. GREEN, III and MARK G. HOLLADAY
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP., et al v. City of Pompano Beach General, et al
as 13-90008
Petitioner:
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP., RICHARD E. ANTHONY, FREDERICK L. GREEN, III and others
Respondent:
CITY OF POMPANO BEACH GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, SHEET METAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND, LABOURERS' PENSION FUND OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN CANADA and others
City of Pompano Beach General Employees' Retirement System v. Synovus Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv01811
Plaintiff:
City of Pompano Beach General Employees' Retirement System, City of Pompano Beach General Employees' Retirement System, City of Pompano Beach General Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Synovus Financial Corp., Synovus Financial Corp., Synovus Financial Corp. and others
Movant:
Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund and Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones-Hinds v. Synovus Financial Corp. of Alabama et al
as 2:2007cv01138
Plaintiff:
Eden Jones-Hinds, Eden Jones-Hinds, Eden Jones-Hinds and others
Defendant:
Synovus Financial Corp. of Alabama, Synovus Financial Corp, First National Bank of Jasper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
