Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Pearson v. New Tampa Bay Rentals, LLC. et al
as 8:2012cv02691
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Pearson
Defendant:
New Tampa Bay Rentals, LLC., Ed Smehtz, Stearns Bank, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Pearson v. Nedco Properties LLC et al
as 8:2012cv00657
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Pearson
Defendant:
Nedco Properties LLC, Michael Rhodes and Highest Oceans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Pearson v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
Taisha L. Pearson
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Bank of America, NA and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SYNOVUS BANK v. FLORAL PROPERTY I LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
SYNOVUS BANK
Defendant:
FLORAL PROPERTY I LLC, FLORAL PROPERTY II LLC, PAULINE J PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 1:2010cv03948
Plaintiff:
Taisha L. Pearson
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Andrews et al v. South Alabama Utilities
as 1:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
Alice M. Andrews , Shaun Goolsby , Ashley Goolsby and others
Defendant:
South Alabama Utilities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Aames Funding Corporation
as 1:2008cv21819
Plaintiff:
Polly Pearson
Defendant:
Aames Funding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Pearson v. Countrywide Home Loans
as 1:2007cv01778
Plaintiff:
Taisha L. Pearson
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pearson v. Countrywide Home Loans
as 1:2007cv01718
Plaintiff:
Taisha L. Pearson
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pearson v. Countrywide Home Loans
as 1:2007mi00206
Plaintiff:
Taisha L. Pearson
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
