Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reeves v. Huguenin et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reeves
Defendant:
David Huguenin, Pat Goodwin, Fountain Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reeves v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
D'Lee Reeves
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Reeves v. Monsanto Company
as 5:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Leanne M. Reeves
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bui v. Reeves
as 1:2019cv02904
Petitioner:
Bridgett Reeves
Plaintiff:
Tuan Bui
Defendant:
Cecil Reeves, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ashton Park Trace Apartments, v. City of Decatur, Georgia, et al
as 17-11321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHTON PARK TRACE APARTMENTS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DECATUR, GEORGIA, URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF DECATUR, POTTS COMPANY, LLC and others
:
SERVICE
Tara Woods et al v. Reeves
as 1:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
Tara Woods and Team Real Estate Management
Defendant:
Demetri Reeves
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ashton Park Trace Apartments, LLC v. City of Decatur, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv04056
Plaintiff:
Ashton Park Trace Apartments, LLC
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Georgia , Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Decatur , The Potts Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avery Park Townhomes v. Reeves
as 1:2014cv01979
Plaintiff:
Avery Park Townhomes
Defendant:
Dmitri Reeves
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reeves et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
Danyelle M. Reeves and Samuel T. Osademe
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US Bank NA v. Reeves
as 1:2009cv00682
Defendant:
Ricky M. Reeves and Amelia F. Reeves
Plaintiff:
US Bank NA
Movant:
Homecomings Financial
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
