Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Kinlow v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
Fredrica Kinlow
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. , U.S. Xpress, Inc. , U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02508
Plaintiff:
Lasonia Harrison and Walter Harrison
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Leroy Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61353
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman et al v. Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01797
Plaintiff:
Sherrin Collins Pittman and Sam Pittman
Defendant:
Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC , U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. , U.S. Xpress, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Golden et al
as 1:2013cv02214
Plaintiff:
Raymon Watson
Defendant:
Antonio Rodriegus Golden and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warner v. U.S. Xpress Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01559
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Inc. and Travis Thomas
Hollis v. Mello et al
as 1:2012cv01654
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Hollis
Defendant:
David James Mello , U.S. Xpress, Inc. , U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Commerce and Industry Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Speth v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00503
Plaintiff:
Patrick P. Speth
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Smith & Son Seafood, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Speth v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Patrick P. Speth
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nam et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03924
Plaintiff:
William Nam and Jin Nam
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. , U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc , U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
