Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 300
Dawson-Webb v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62012
Plaintiff: Latoya Dawson-Webb
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godwin v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 6:2017cv01585
Plaintiff: Joseph A. Godwin
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamblen et al v. Davol, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv01613
Plaintiff: Barbara Hamblen and Herbert Hamblen
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norma Olmo, et al v. Davol, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-11784
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORMA OLMO and NELSON OLMO
Defendant - Appellee: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Melendez et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2016cv02175
Plaintiff: Barbara Melendez and Hector Melendez
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Inc. , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodbury v. C.R. Bard, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv03229
Plaintiff: Judith Woodbury
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ripple v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv14455
Plaintiff: Jean Ripple
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feeney v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01791
Plaintiff: Thomas Jefferson Feeney
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff: Teresa Sanders
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francis v. Davol Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60208
Plaintiff: Teresa Francis
Defendant: Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?