Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Gerhart et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20661
Plaintiff:
Laura Gerhart , John Huebner , Kangyi Chen and others
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc. , Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rickert et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20673
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Rickert and Robert Schmidt
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Automotive Dismantlers and Recyclers Association, Inc. v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20520
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Automotive Dismantlers and Recyclers Association, Inc. and Automotive Dismantlers and Recyclers Association, Inc. doing business as Automotive Recyclers Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Day v. Takata Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01427
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paul Day
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rickert et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01420
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Rickert and Robert Schmidt
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01231
Plaintiff:
Jane Saint Drake and Paul V. Kilpatrick, III
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Totoya Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivas-Vigil v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv60183
Plaintiff:
Humberto Rivas-Vigil
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
