Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Garland v. B.S.O. Mail Crime Lab Deputy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2015cv61781
Plaintiff: Anthony Demetrius Garland
Defendant: B.S.O. Mail Crime Lab Deputy, B.S.O. Female Crime Lab Deputy, B.S.O. Deputy Luis Galindez, I.D. #5592 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv01046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Panayotov v. Aronson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00750
Plaintiff: Samouil Bogomilov Panayotov
Defendant: Alan Aronson, Donna E. Blanton, Michele Gavagni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. FLORIDA BAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00459
Plaintiff: DAVID A HARPER
Defendant: JOANN MARIE STALCUP, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, FLORIDA BAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan v. McGrady et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv02000
Plaintiff: Marius D. Sloan
Defendant: J. Thomas McGrady, Charles A. Davis, Jr., Craig C. Villanti, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addys Walker v. Charles Canady, et al
as 11-13725
Plaintiff - Appellant: ADDYS T. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES T. CANADY, Chief Justice in His Professional and Individual Capacities, BARBARA J. PARIENTE, Justice in Her Professional and Individual Capacities, R. FRED LEWIS, Justice in His Professional and Individual Capacities and others
WALKER v. CANADY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00068
Defendant: CHARLES T CANADY , BARBARA J PARIENTE , R FRED LEWIS and others
Plaintiff: ADDYS T WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?