Cases 41 - 50 of 107,170
Caplan v. Hyper Deals Auto Sales, Corp. et al
as 0:2024cv60890
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Hyper Deals Auto Sales, Corp. and Pelican Bays Ground Lessor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Council et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Bank of America Co
Claimant:
LUCINDA COUNCIL, RAVYNNE GILMORE, VERNA MAITLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heard v. Mahakal Sahai d/b/a 7 Eleven
as 8:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Tamoris Heard
Defendant:
Mahakal Sahai d/b/a 7 Eleven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Odonoghue v. Fuller
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant:
Judge Joseph C Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE)
Caplan v. C-Tech Auto Repairs, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60893
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
C-Tech Auto Repairs, Inc., Troy Iuen and Monique Iuen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
