Cases 41 - 50 of 1,769
Caplan v. Gino Tires, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20300
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Gino Tires, Inc. and J & G Investment Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hamel v. Austin
as 6:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Gordon R. Hamel
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jalieba v. Crim et al
as 5:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Paul Jalieba
Defendant:
Anthony Crim, Antonio Crim, K. K. Howle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris v. Archie et al
as 2:2023cv14392
Plaintiff:
David L. Harris and Shonda T. Harris
Defendant:
La Solomon J. Archie, Scott A. Wells, Lt. Robert Petit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson et al v. Department of Children & Families et al
as 9:2023cv81541
Plaintiff:
Randal A. Ferguson, R.A.F. J., R.A.F. and others
Defendant:
Department of Children & Families, Child Net Inc., Nicole Slade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHERIDAN v. STATE OF IDAHO
as 3:2023cv24771
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SHERIDAN
Defendant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Orlando Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv02325
Plaintiff:
Xavier Alexander
Defendant:
Orlando Police Department, Andrew J Mamone and City of Orlando
Not Classified By Court:
Brian J Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
