Cases 61 - 70 of 93
CATER v. HARRIS
as 5:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
EUGENE CATER
Defendant:
DORIS HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orshowitz v. Dappen et al
as 2:2014cv14197
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Orshowitz
Defendant:
Donald Dappen, TROY W MORRIS, chadwick e wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorgensen v. Wilson et al
as 9:2014cv80264
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eugene Jorgensen
Defendant:
Ronald R. Wilson, Lisa Saul and Jeremy Banks
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Hooker v. Shinseki
as 8:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prado v. El Floridita Seafood Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv20269
Defendant:
El Floridita Seafood Restaurant Corp., Eugene Eisman, Mae Eisman and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Prado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Prado v. The Silver Lining Distributor, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20270
Defendant:
The Silver Lining Distributor, Inc., Mae Eisman, Eugene Eisman and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Prado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe v. Reemployment Assistance Program of the State of Florida
as 0:2013cv60113
Plaintiff:
Reginald Eugene Joe
Defendant:
Reemployment Assistance Program of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. The Florida Department of Children And Families - Agency et al
as 1:2012cv24503
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
The Florida Department of Children And Families - Agency, Anne Marie Joseph, Medgth Eugene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
COLESON v. BONDI et al
as 4:2012cv00576
Plaintiff:
JIMMY EUGENE COLESON
Defendant:
PAMELA JO BONDI and BRYAN JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
