Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Ronald Emrit v. Braden River Library, et al
as 14-14254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADEN RIVER LIBRARY and CITY OF SARASOTA
Ronald Emrit v. Florida Board of Bar Examiners, et al
as 14-12883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, FLORIDA BAR and AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 14-11359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, JOHN P. SEILER, Mayor, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and others
EMRIT v. FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS
as 4:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, FLORIDA BAR and AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emrit v. Miami-Dade County Public Housing and Community Development et al
as 1:2014cv20890
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County Public Housing and Community Development, The Housing Authority of the City of Miami Beach and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Scott et al
as 0:2014cv60597
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Rick Scott, John P. Seiler, Florida Department of Children and Families and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Emrit v. Braden River Library et al
as 8:2014cv00564
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Braden River Library and City of Sarasota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
